Brazil gives Meta 72 hours to explain new fact-check policies

submitted by Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca

globalnation.inquirer.net/260785/brazil-gives-m…

1.1k

Log in to comment

145 Comments

Brazil has been on it lately. At least with sticking it to tech bros

, edited

Yeah, they found out they could win, when they stuck it to X and straight up banned them until they complied.

Just like the big tech companies have different ToS for EU consumers.

Mad respect to them, but it should be normal. But it's not.

Also like California passing public health laws and companies deciding it is easier to comply to the entire U.S. instead of duplicating product lines.

Same State for car emission standards as well. Too bad our cities are shit holes because of all the car infrastructure though.

And I love them for it.

Not on my 2025 bingo card I'll admit, but I'm here for it.

All the BRICS have. Brazil just stands out, because its not a country we've flagged as "Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages".

Not all, India is in BRICS and they are part of the problem in the tech world.

It's so disappointing. India has a massive tech service industry and could've been a force for good, but the government loves their censorship and authoritarianism too much.

The limited view I have into the CEO culture there seems even more toxic than America's.

It also helps that unlike the R and the C in BRICS, they aren't imperialists threatening and/or invading their neighbours. Brazil is a good world citizen.

Brazil is a good world citizen.

Uhhh, did you forget that Brazil was being run by a fascist war criminal just a short while ago?

And now it isn't, that's democracy, baby

I fully agree that Bolsonaro was a straight up demon, but I also agree with the idea that - currently - the current administration of Brazil is probably about as good an example of a good world citizen as it gets

And now it isn’t, that’s democracy,

Abso-fucking-lutely not. Fascists would NEVER be able to gain power in a truly democratic society. No ifs, ands or butts.

Fascists are funded into power (and into existence) by CAPITALISTS - adherents to an ideology that is violently incompatible with anything that can be called democratic with a straight face.

Brazil is not a democratic society. It is a (so-called) "liberal democracy" - something that can be more accurately described as 95% capitalism with some fake democracy substitute thrown in as a legitimising measure.

That is THE WHOLE POINT of liberalism.

So were lots of countries. At least they learned from their mistake, unlike the US.

At least they learned from their mistake, unlike the US.

If Brazil had learned from it's mistake it WOULDN'T HAVE ALLOWED A FASCIST INTO POWER, genius.

short while

IT'S BEEN 4 YEARS WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN??

The Holocaust was a short while ago, tadpole. Read a history book.

No wonder with all these off-duty cops I keep hearing about.

As long as it keeps censoring its citizens, everthing fine! 🙄

Eh?

Fact checking is censorship apparently.

Kind weird to think that's what's happening tbh

I think you might be confused. They were talking about a country other than the US. 😂

, edited

Oh yeah, Russia is *real good* at keeping those tech oligarchs in check /s

BRICS is such a loosely linked group that generalising like that is just never going to be accurate; Indian and South African, for example, policy on tech regulation couldn't be more different if they tried.

Don't get me wrong, I think BRICS is a good organisation for economic cooperation between these very diverse countries, but there's really no common political, social or economic characteristics.

Brazil is a good example of that, because under Bolsonaro, it couldn't have been more different - regulations on big tech and banning X would never have happened under his tenure (well, at least not with the same goals)

, edited

because its not a country we’ve flagged as “Evil Enemy Run By Inhuman Savages”.

Unless the subject is Amazon deforestation, in which case we have to stop these inhuman savages from destroying this global patrimony (mine). Please don't ask who's buying the cattle and soy being grown there or running the mining companies or where I got all this fertile land.

, edited

Idk which video was, but Brazil tremendously improved on the Amazon deforestation issue. https://youtu.be/6gI-wKbKfeI

Yes, a lot of things changed for the better once they got rid of Bolsonaro

You have a cool profile!

Aww thank you!

, edited

Reminds me of people who said Amazon deforestation warranted a "military intervention." Hey, be funny if trumpet added another country to his want-to-invade list, wouldn't it? Yet folks still feel bothered when I say people in rich countries don't really care all that much about poorer ones.

Not India afaik

Truth. Also stop deforestation

Brasil, please ban facebook. First twitter then facebook.
Fuck the gready corporate assholes. Someone needs to make a first step and create a precedent, we need this.
Social media will be (already is) the downfall of our civilization.

Sadly I don't think it will happen since we are extremely dependent on whatsapp because our SMS sucked ass since the inception, messages were costly and always arrived late.

Deleted by author

reply
5

People in general are too stupid to integrate these solutions in their daily lives, you should know better.

Deleted by author

reply
1

It's surely an important subject, but it's unfortunately not in the interests of the goverment.

By the way, sorry if I sounded mean, that wasn't my intention.

Giving 72h to reply on a Friday is a nice touch ;⁠-⁠)

"there is none". Explained in 10 seconds. Happy weekend!

, edited

Common Brazil W

Double entendre: “eu” means “me” in Portuguese

Nice

not always considering bolsonaro existed and was a tech bros wet dream

, edited

Eu isn’t doing shit tho. Twitter and meta do just fine here.

Hve you heard of GDPR? USB-C mandate? Right to repair?

, edited

Right to repair? Repair what? Surely not a new iphone.

Do you seriously think that meta cares for your personal data if youre European? No? Then how come they are allowed to operate?

The EU fined Meta multiple billions. You can always do more, but it's a start

How is that a start if their services are still profitable and poisonous to every mind exposed to them?

, edited

The right to repair laws will take effect in (at the latest) July 30 2026.

Manufactures have until then to decide what to do. Maybe Apple will just straight pull out of EU or comply by then.

It's a painfully slow process but better than not even trying like all other states on this planet.

Edit: source https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/consumer-protection-law/directive-repair-goods_en

"We don't have to pretend anymore."

According to the extrajudicial notice, this allows users to associate sexual identity to “a mental illness or abnormality” and allows “the defense of professional limitations based on gender.”

Why does anyone associate with this site. It's beyond me.

I feel like it’s just boomers at this point

Facebook maybe, but I'm dumbfounded by how many people in my life are actively using Instagram.

, edited

Good. At least someone is saying something. More people and companies should voice their opinion.

Did not expect Brazil to be the hero we need right now, but I’m here for it.

Brazil has at least some history of fighting against tech giant's disrespect of regularions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazil

Yeah and I wasn't expecting that one either. Sounds like I should start to, though.

Lula be right more often than not. Oops I mean left.

It's some high judge so I think they are independent from the government but I don't know their system well.

I wonder how much biased is this article (in the sense that it was written mostly by male US citizens).

Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine Brazil apparently propping up the internet, but huge swathes of twitter shutdown when Brazil banned it a while back, for a short time.

It's easy to be bold when the US president is weak. I don't think they'd ban X if Trump was president at the time.

reply
-136
, edited

Deleted by author

reply
2

Hahahahahaha, that was a good one. Do another one where you pretend Trump wasn't the biggest, weakest idiot ever to hold this office.

I don't know, Buchanan let the civil war happen?

Mine and everyone else's lifetime though for sure.

Because he'd do *what* about another country banning a *privately owned website?*

Whatever his sugar daddy tells him to do

Gonna demand that Brazil be handed over to the US the same way he's demanding the US own the Panama Canal, Greenland, and Canada?

If only we were SO STRONG!!!

So strong he needs both hands to drink a glass of water?

Or is it the way he literally shits himself in the middle of a rally? Oh wait, of course! Cause the only thing strong about that dementia riddled moron is his stench.

Imagine looking at Trump and thinking, "Wow, him strong!" Fucking weird, I tell ya what...

It’s easy to be bold when the US president is weak.

Vladimir Putin agrees and is greatly looking forward to it.

, edited

Yeah, Trump is so strong and respected that everyone at the UN laughed at his stupid face when he said he'd accomplished more in 2 years than most administrations in the history of the US.

Lmfao traitor filth trump is the weakest piece of useless shit to ever disgrace the office of the presidency.

Hehe, I for one am going to enjoy watching the U.S. economy tank for the next four years and take the maga idiots down a notch or two.

those maga idiots will use that as proof there's a global conspiracy against america and that their only protection is donald trump

Confessed serial rapist Donald Trump is one of the weakest presidents we've ever had, the fuck are you talking about. We, quite literally, have video of world leaders laughing at him to his face. Jeff Epstein's best friend who bragged that they have the same "On the younger side" tastes didn't accomplish a single one of his campaign promises the first time, other than tax cuts for the super rich.

Makes sense for any country tondo this because as has become clear, it doesn't matter if you're a democracy or a dictatorship, if you are liking musk and face or not, X and meta can and will destabilize your country and once it happens, there is nothing you can do about it except banning the entire site, which will be an unpopular choice.

Musk especially has shown to be all about himself and he'll just push whatever political right wing party to destabilize a country.

Fuck x, fuck Facebook

, edited

Deleted by author

reply
24

Calling Twitter "X"??? One should not.

Oh yeah, though at this point who cares, it's all bullshit

Deleted by author

reply
0

Is there any way to hide embedded images on lemmy?

These are pretty annoying.

Maybe some specific frontend or mobile app.

, edited

Use Lynx browser, if that's even still a thing?

EDIT: It is!

Always one of the first things I install with a new Arch Linux install! Not because it's useful or anything, I'm not delusional, but because it's hella cool

, edited

A modern use case: I like RSS in my terminal so I use newsboat but hate it opening firefox and swapping me out of the terminal when I want to read more. So I have it use lynx instead.

I also have a computer without a DE that can browse the web (lynx), look at pictures (JP2a), watch movies (I don't recall the name of the program but it converts the video to ASCII), edit word docs (take your pick), and send email (mail).

I've always preferred w3m or links over lynx.

Never tried that, thanks for the suggestion

Links handles javascript better, though.

trollface

robot with sign "no fun allowed"

as a PSA, before 🫵you post images on the internet, it's important to put alt text whenever you can. Some people need screen readers to acess the web, and it can give context to help understand it. Give a good description, and if there's text on it, include that in the alt text. Acessibility is important!

, edited

Brazil gives Meta 72 hours to explain new fact-check policies>

Meta: we don't have any

They do, tho. It's community notes. If multiple people agree on a correction, especially if those people usually disagree with eachother, it becomes the note

based lula

Meta's anti-LGBT rules are closely knit to their ending the fact-checking: It is science denialism and linked to racism and vaccine skepticism.

Homosexuality and gender identity are not considered mental illnesses, Sex is not a binary, and Race is not connected to intelligence.

Bigots never liked science on these three, and now they use political power to impose their narrative.

Meta never moderated such discourse. Nor reddit nor twitter nor youtube. There was no censorship to end here. What this is, it is a free pass to punch down trans and gay people. It is incitement to violence, and Zuckerberg and Musk must go to the gallows for it.

Don't get me started on the toxic harassment these platforms have allowed against African and Carribean reparation activists, how they have destroyed the lives of feminists, and how they have named all Palestinians terrorists.

At this point race realists and gender essentialists have ensured political and technological control of the narrative.

There is no room for debating sealioning trolls on this one. If they don't understand the social dynamics against gender/sex/minorities at this moment, they are no better than brownshirts.

It is permabans and hooks and jabs all the way, for every single weird freak that backs this deranged hateful shit.

, edited

It is permabans and hooks and jabs all the way, for every single weird freak that backs this deranged hateful shit.

I agree. As a mod on LW myself I have to wonder how far the admin are willing to go to enforce such a policy. Are they really going to start removing mods for banning trolls and bigots‽

*Edit: oops, I got the posts mixed up. I thought this was the post about lemmy.world's new policy on debating trolls instead of banning them.

I'm thankful for Sunshine for posting this. She's a real one!

And I'm also thankful for those who have upvoted this post instead of some generic US politics one. Gives some very needed diversity to the front page.

Proceeds to bring up the US anyway

"we hate gays"

Brazil's based, now?

Enjoy it while it lasts. We like to immitate the US so in 2026 it's very likely that we'll elect a reactionary idiot again.

If you ban social media companies that don't regulate their shit you won't.

If we ban social media companies* we won't.

Privately owned social media is a tool of media manipulation. You can change the weights of some inscrutable algorithm and boost exposure to political ideologies that you want while no one can truly make a case against you, "it's just the algorithm" they say. There's no scenario where they should be allowed to exist in a sovereign country.

How many bribes is Meta going to have to pay out?

Community note: Bribes are illegal and won't be tolerated in sparkly clean Brazil.

couldn't they just turn off brazil? they do this to myanmar all the time

For some completely unrelated reason, I suddenly have this song stuck in my head...

https://www.tiktok.com/@originalsinfluencer/video/7443873893430971678

Brazil needs to solve their high homicide rate before demanding things from Meta. Serving the people instead of being petty.

Your fallacies-to-words ratio is outstanding.

You need to solve your downvote rate before posting.

You know, countries can do more than one thing at a time

Brazil has rampant poverty, high homicide rates, and corruption. Meta is the least of their problem. Get to work...

Let's talk about their homicide rate. In 2022, the country with the largest number of trans people murdered was Brazil.

Do you think that a platform that now allows open anti-trans bigotry will make that problem better or worse?

why?

Yeah, cause those are totally related...somehow...really, I promise!

What the fuck are you smoking??? Please don't share. Seriously.