Solar + Battery (covering 97% of demand) is now cheaper than coal and nuclear
submitted by
ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2025/06/Ember-24-H…
Some key insights from the article:





Basically, what they did was to look at how much batteries would be needed in a given area to provide constant power supply at least 97% of the time, and the calculate the costs of that solar+battery setup compared to coal and nuclear.
Loading comments...
Loading comments...
ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FAEFB6177B4672DEE07F9D3AFC62588CCD2631EDCF22E8CCC1FB35B501C9C86
p3x.de
Share on Mastodon