We Overhauled Our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - Another VC funded bait and switch

submitted by

zed.dev/blog/terms-update#links-and-contact

Following in the footsteps of Hashicorp, Hudson, etc. Zed has chosen to cash in the good will of its now substantial user base and start going to full corporate enshittification. Among other things like minimum age nonsense, they have also added binding mandatory opt-OUT arbitration.

I find such agreements very troubling, because it gives up public funded dispute resolution for private which nearly unanimously benefits larger entities, it lowers transparency to near zero, and eliminates the abilities to act as a class and to appeal. But I worry most will just accept it, as is the norm.

You can however opt out by emailing arbitration-opt-out@zed.dev with full legal name, the email address associated with your account, and a statement that you want to opt out.

I’ll just consider my days of advocating for Zed as an interesting new editor over and go back to Neovim bliss.

25
82
2

Log in to comment

Hot Top New Old

For anybody wondering “what is a Zed, and why would I need it":

Zed is a minimal code editor crafted for speed and collaboration with humans and AI.

A code editor built on an industry burning through venture capital? Great.

Arbitration. The updated Terms include a binding arbitration clause with a class action waiver. Arbitration provides a faster, lower-cost resolution process for disputes between individual users and Zed compared to traditional litigation. We recognize this is a meaningful legal trade-off, which is why we include a 30-day opt-out window after you accept the Terms. Section 15 has the full details, including how to opt out.

I like how they try to frame arbitration as efficient.

 reply
34

They never state who it’s more efficient and cost effective for, so I’m sure it’s true… from a certain point of view.

 reply
21

That’s the big secret. Efficient at what is never discussed. It’s very efficient [… at lowering legal costs, and avoiding consequences and accountability]. As long as no one says the quiet part out loud, everything is “fine” [… for them].

 reply
8

Dictatorships can be very efficient, tons of time saved by no meetings, delays, stakeholders, rights, debate or considerations needed.

 reply
6

I like the irony of that.

Our code is hallucinated but our legal team is very, very real

 reply
13

I’ve never felt the need to sue a text editor. It’s concerning that they’re so worried about it.

 reply
9
edited

VC Lawyers insist. Not worth it for the company to fight for something (not going to arbitration) that no one will notice or care about if it doesn’t change. Or maybe they didn’t care.

I’m just saying capitalism ruins everything because investors only care about maximizing profit and minimizing risk, this forces bullshit like this onto everyone downstream. One solution is not to use the product. Better solution is to change the law to make mandatory arbitration illegal. Best solution is to throw billionaires into the ocean and stir the solution until the solid is fully dissolved.

 reply
6
edited

I was with you right up until stirring the ocean. I feel like that’s going to cause a lot of problems. Middle of the ocean and leave them, or an active volcano.

 reply
2

The earth has enough microplastics.

I’ve heard that the best billionaires really love Greenland, just let them roam free in northern Greenland (wouldn’t want to annoy any actual Greenlanders). Don’t worry about them, these Masters of Industry will pull themselves up by their bootstraps and have a fire and shelter in no time.

 reply
2

Appreciate the heads up. I’m reasonably sure I’ve already uninstalled it anyway, but I’ll check tomorrow to make sure.

 reply
4

It looks like the code is mostly under GPL. Has anyone tried forking it?

 reply
2

A guy on HN forked as “gram” https://codeberg.org/GramEditor/gram he doesn’t intend to pull everything from upstream

 reply
2

Comments in Opensource@programming.dev

I love how if we want out we have to basically verify identity. Such shit.

 reply
9

Meanwhile, vim keeps trucking along, 34 years later.

 reply
6

Privacy Surveillance Policy

 reply
6

Comments in Linux@lemmy.ml

edited

Never understood a terms of service existing if the project code license is GPL or such. Can’t this just be forked and cured of anti features, if people value it enough to do so?

Binding arbitration (aka, if we break the law you can’t sue us) aught to be illegal in every country.

 reply
21
she/her

It already happened: https://gram.liten.app

 reply
22
edited

Note that Zed has an Affero GPL, which limits others from competing with Zed Industries in the service space.

 reply
3
edited

The zed-industries Github repository lists Zed licenses as AGPL, Apache and GPLv3.

The AGPL refers to the GNU Affero General Public license, which does not limit others from competing. Unless you mean the fact that forks must share source code when accessed over a network?

 reply
15

I mistakenly thought it was more restrictive, thanks.

 reply
7

Doesn’t the AGPL just say that you can’t keep your changes/improvements private? (honest question: I seem to recall so, but I’m not really sure)

 reply
8

It seems you’re right. I may be confusing it with another license.

It is intended for software designed to be run over a network, adding a provision requiring that the corresponding source code of modified versions of the software be prominently offered to all users who interact with the software over a network.

 reply
6

Thanks for checking and reporting back! (I was too lazy to do that)

 reply
3
OP edited

The terms on the right to use user data in section 4.1 are also a bit surprising. I’d expect that from a social network like Facebook, but not from a text editor.

 reply
15

this seems to only apply to their hosted services and not the binary itself?

 reply
2
Insert image