Technical Discussion

RE: mastodon.social/@reiver/116597More on a resume / CV on the Fediverse on Social Web.Another option could be to use something like "JSON resume":jsonresume.org/github.com/jsonresume/resume-sIt seems to be popular. It isn't JSON-LD. Although I think it would be straightforward to translate it to JSON-LD, if that was desired.#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD #JSONresume

On Tags (including Hash-Tags) in ActivityPub.

RE: mastodon.social/@reiver/116597There is also the other question of — would the resume / CV be JSON-LD.On one hand, if it was in JSON-LD, it would make it machine-legible similar to ActivityPub.On the other hand, I don't think anyone is going to write JSON-LD (especially HTML embedded in a JSON string value) by hand. But, I do think some people will want to write their resume by hand.It feels like user-experience is fighting with JSON-LD based machine-legibility.#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev #ProToGo #JSONLD

How could you represent a resume / CV on the Fediverse and Social Web? Where would you put it? Etc?

In ActivityPub, these are all equivalent:

ActivityPub specifications don't seem to provide a way to do Idempotent POSTs to your outbox.

There is a comparison that can be made between ActivityPub and Event-Sourcing.

It seems as if the uploadMedia ActivityPub extension does not provide a way to resume an upload that didn't previously compete.

Both Mastodon and Pixelfed seem to attach images as ActivityPub/ActivityStreams "type" = 'Document'.

I think it would be better if instead of Fediverse software outputting the following for ActivityPub/ActivityStreams Notes, Articles, etc:

Was the original intent of the ActivityPub / ActivityStreams "name" field to be a title?

What should the file-extension for ActivityPub / ActivityStreams documents be.

RE: mastodon.social/@reiver/116471If an ActivityPub Actor is something that has an "inbox" or an "outbox" (i.e., it could have just one or both) then —Perhaps we should also be talking about "sources" and "sinks", too. Where —An ActivityPub Source is an Actor with just an "outbox" (and no "inbox").And, an ActivityPub Sink is an Actor with just an "inbox" (and no "outbox").#ActivityPub #ActivityStreams #FediDev

Can an ActivityPub 'Place' also be an Actor?

What makes an ActivityPub Actor and Actor?

Should an ActivityPub 'Place' be used to represent a fictional place?

I am outputting ActivityPub/ActivityStreams content for the listing of what is in a directory.

So, an interesting issue came up in the #Fedify repo that I’ve been thinking about: [#629].

1/

I used to not like JSON-LD. And then I got exposed to CBOR. And, since then, I ended up liking JSON-LD more than I did before.

With ActivityPub / ActivityStreams...

I've seen an ongoing debate between "Note" versus "Article" in ActivityPub / ActivityStreams.